The online early section of Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution this week has the first comprehensive phylogeny of a rather important genus of ants: Myrmica. Myrmica is ubiquitous in the colder climates of North America and Eurasia, with a few seemingly incongruous species inhabiting the mountains of tropical southeast Asia. The genus contains about 200 species, [...]
Posts Tagged ‘phylogenetics’
The Myrmica Phylogeny
Posted in Ants, Science, Taxonomy, tagged Ants, Evolution, Insects, myrmecology, myrmica, phylogenetics on February 16, 2010 | 4 Comments »
The most ambitious arthropod phylogeny yet
Posted in Science, Taxonomy, tagged arthropods, Evolution, Insects, phylogenetics on February 11, 2010 | 16 Comments »
The top-tier journal Nature doesn’t often deal in purely phylogenetic research. So when such a study graces their pages we know it’s big stuff. Yesterday, Nature published a 62 gene, 75 species analysis of the evolutionary history of the arthropods. Arthropods, as readers of this blog likely know, are animals with a chitinous exoskeleton and [...]
The problem with “Basal”
Posted in Ants, Science, Taxonomy, tagged Evolution, phylogenetics on January 21, 2010 | 17 Comments »
Earlier I chastised Christian Peeters and Mathieu Molet for misinterpreting the term “basal” in a phylogenetic context. What was that about?
The trouble with MrBayes
Posted in Science, tagged bayesian inference, Evolution, MrBayes, phylogenetics on December 21, 2009 | 8 Comments »
Sorry for an uncharacteristically technical post. But, I’ve produced an excellent example of a problem that’s been plaguing the widely-used phylogenetics program MrBayes and thought it might be of interest to the handful of systematists who read this blog. I’ve been running analyses on the Azteca y’all sent after my desperate plea last month and [...]
The trouble with phylogenetics
Posted in Navel-Gazing, Science, tagged Evolution, phylogenetics, systematics on December 3, 2009 | 6 Comments »
Here’s an issue that’s been on my mind as I’m shuffling trees around from several concurrent phylogenetic projects. The primary output from phylogenetics programs is tree diagrams depicting the relationships among organisms. Very clean, very crisp, very precise diagrams. Precision isn’t in itself a problem, but for the human foible of mistaking precision for accuracy. [...]
Speed bumps for our understanding of ant evolution
Posted in Ants, Science, tagged Ants, Evolution, myrmecology, phylogenetics on November 17, 2009 | 11 Comments »
This tree depicts how colony size evolves in ants. The purple/blue colors represent small colonies with only a few to a few dozen ants, while the yellows and oranges represent species with enormous colonies of tens or hundreds of thousands of individuals. What’s exciting about this rainbow-colored figure? If you were expecting ant evolution to [...]
Why does Myrmecos Blog have it out for E. O. Wilson?
Posted in Ants, Science, tagged academics, E. O. Wilson, Evolution, myrmecology, phylogenetics, superorganism on January 3, 2009 | 12 Comments »
In the comments, Eric Eaton makes an observation: I’m left wondering (just a little) why Alex has such a beef with Dr. Wilson. This is not the first post taking a jab at Wilson, so while Alex makes an excellent point, I’m also sensing some underlying issues here…. Eric is right there’s an issue. It [...]
New genes for studying beetle evolution (or, blogging my own research)
Posted in beetles, Science, tagged coleoptera, Evolution, phylogenetics, phylogeny on August 13, 2008 | 2 Comments »
Our first paper from the Beetle Tree of Life study has been published. Here’s the citation: Wild, A. L. & Maddison, D. R. 2008. Evaluating nuclear protein-coding genes for phylogenetic utility in beetles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.023 My co-author David Maddison once summarized the point of the paper as “Hey guys! New genes!”
Kin Selection Rescued by Phylogenetics?
Posted in Ants, Insect Links, Science, tagged Bees, Darwin, Evolution, kin selection, phylogenetics on May 31, 2008 | 3 Comments »
30 years ago, biologists thought they’d solved one of Darwin’s thorniest problems, the evolution of sterile social insects:








