• Home
  • About Alex Wild
  • Articles
  • Galleries
  • Myrmecology News

Myrmecos Blog

the little things matter

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Trap-jaw ant photos at myrmecos.net
Ants at the Encyclopedia of Life »

Is it ok to crop a photo?

September 7, 2008 by myrmecos

In an earlier discussion on the merits of megapixels, commentator and snail guru Aydin notes:

Megapixel counts matter if you need to crop out large sections of an image & still need to retain enough pixels for a large enough print.

To illustrate Aydin’s point, I’ve taken a full photo of an Australian Monomorium nest and cropped it away to show just the queen ant:

Viola! Instant magnification. I can get away with a tight crop because the original photo spans over 6 million pixels.  Blog photos only need 100,000 pixels.  Plenty of pixels to spare.  Once I get my hands on the Canon 50D, I’ll have 15 million pixels and the resolution to crop down to a single small ant.

So I can crop, but should I?  Is cropping a good thing?

Purists like Dalantech at the No Cropping Zone hold a firm line: No.

Bad habits are easy to get into, but difficult to break. If you get into the habit of cropping all your images then you’ll never put a lot of effort into composition or framing. Why should you when you can just crop it later, right?

While I am inclined to agree with Dalantech, I don’t think cropping need be detrimental to learning.  I first learned composition through cropping.  Once I got the hang of improving a photo by cutting out distractions and shifting the frame in post-processing, I started trying to get it right in the field using just the viewfinder.  Cropping was a bit like training wheels.

Once I went commercial things changed fast.  It turns out that photo buyers sometimes need a lot of pixels, especially for posters and museum displays.  I can vouch for how embarrassing it is to lose sales because the image was too heavily cropped to be enlarged.   Nowadays I aim to nail the composition in the viewfinder first, and if I do crop I do so sparingly, retaining at least 70% of the original pixels.

The persistent temptation in macro-photography is to crop for a bit of extra “magnification”.  If you find yourself cropping as a matter of routine, it’s worth thinking about updating your optics.  Think about it this way: If you are chopping half the pixels off your 10MP images, you may as well have bought a cheaper 5MP camera and spent the difference on a more powerful lens or a set of extension tubes.  You’d get the same effective magnification but your images will be sharper and smoother.

Here is a shot of the same queen ant as in my example above, but with magnification augmented the old-fashioned way.  I used a more powerful setting on the MP-E 65mm lens.

A crisper, cleaner image.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Insect Links, Photography Links, Tricks of the Trade | Tagged cropping, macrophotography, queen ant, techniques | 6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. on September 7, 2008 at 4:46 pm esbandido

    Just stumbled across your blog and wanted to tell you that I love your photography and your perspective on things.


  2. on September 7, 2008 at 7:04 pm Aydin

    I agree. The magnification you get by cropping an image is like the “empty magnification” one would get if one took a photo taken thru a microscope using a 10x objective and then enlarged it to a size it would be if one had used a 40x objective.

    Nevertheless, cropping is still useful if you want to get rid of the extraneous matter (30%) around a point of interest, while retaining enough pixels.

    Obviously, megapixels are also good if you want to print big pictures.


  3. on September 7, 2008 at 7:23 pm Beetles In The Bush

    Cropping is a must if you get into insect photography and all you’ve got is a 6MP point-and-shoot 😉

    I really really want to upgrade, and when I do this will be good stuff to know. But I’ve got some saving to do – in the meantime, I’ll have to crop.


  4. on September 7, 2008 at 7:28 pm myrmecos

    Ted,

    True, true. I’m assuming an SLR here, of course. Point-and-shoots are constrained in their own way and only a few models have respectable macro.


  5. on September 7, 2008 at 11:16 pm davidcupp

    While I tend to agree that cropping is often used to compensate for laziness, there are reasons why it can be useful. Sometimes you just can’t get close enough to the subject, and when you’re in the field you’re stuck with the equipment you brought along. In those cases it’s nice to know that even though you might not get as tight a photo as you’d like, you can fix it in the darkroom (whether chemical or digital).

    From my perspective, I use 1:1 and 1:2 formats for my fine art work as a stylistic choice. Obviously this involves some cropping, though in response to Dalantech’s point I would point out that compose for the crop, which can actually be even more difficult than composing for a perfect crop OOC.

    Just a few thoughts I had while I was reading your excellent post.


  6. on September 10, 2008 at 5:57 am Clay Bolt

    Alex,

    I always strive to do as much as I can with an image “in-camera” because I certainly don’t need any more images to post-process than I already have. However, per David’s comment above, sometimes one just doesn’t have an option to move in any tighter on a subject.

    One thing that helps with all of this is shooting your image in RAW mode. Since RAW files are not at all compressed, it makes it easier to crop in and increase the size of the file while losing as little of the quality of the image as possible. There are are also some Photoshop plug-ins like Alien-Skin Blow-Up which can help you make images larger in a cleaner way if you find yourself in this situation.

    Clay



Comments are closed.


  • This blog is an archive; the Myrmecos blog has moved.

    Please update your bookmarks!
  • Alex’s Galleries

    alexanderwild.com

  • Recent Photos

    ... beneaththestreets...Mount Rainier WildflowersShining pathHubble Gazes at a Dazzling Star ClusterWhen there was a belly and spinach from the gardenHole in the Sky
    More Photos
  • Biology Links

    • Tree of Life
    • Understanding Evolution
  • Blogroll

    • Ainsley Vs Livejournal
    • Ammonite
    • Anna’s Bee World
    • Archetype
    • Arthropoda blog
    • Backyard Arthropod Project
    • Beetles in the Bush
    • biodiversity in focus
    • Bug Dreams
    • Bug Eric
    • Bug Girl’s Blog
    • Burrard-Lucas Photoblog
    • Catalogue of Organisms
    • Creature Cast
    • Dan Heller
    • Debbie's Insect Blog
    • Dechronization
    • Drawing the MotMot
    • Entomoblog
    • Evolving Thoughts
    • Fall to Climb
    • Generant
    • Historias de Hormigas
    • Life on Six Legs
    • Macromite
    • microecos
    • mirmekolozi
    • myrmecoid
    • Myrmician
    • Natural Imagery
    • Nature in the Ozarks
    • NCSU Insect Blog
    • No Cropping Zone
    • omit needless words
    • Photo Synthesis
    • Princess Peppercloud
    • Science Blogs
    • Snail’s Tales
    • Stu Jenks
    • The Ant Hunter
    • The Ant Room
    • The Bug Whisperer
    • The Loom
    • This Week in Evolution
    • What's Bugging You?
    • Wild about Ants
    • Xenogere
  • Insect Links

    • Ant Farm Forum
    • Ant Insights
    • Antweb
    • Bug Squad
    • bugguide.net
    • Xerces Society
  • Photography Links

    • Canon Photography Forums
    • Digital Photography Review
    • DIY Photography
    • Igor Siwanowicz
    • Mark Plonsky
    • photo.net
    • Piotr Naskrecki
    • The Strobist
  • Popular Posts

    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Long-necked Ground Beetle
    • Eastern North America is the Asian Lady Beetle's Bridge to the World
    • Things that look like ants but aren't (Part 1)
    • Pheidole tepicana
    • You say dominula, I say dominulus
    • Pyramica vs Strumigenys: why does it matter?
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Goldenrod Soldier Beetles
    • Galleries
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Temnoscheila Bark-Gnawing Beetle
    • Rover Ants (Brachymyrmex patagonicus), an emerging pest species
  • Recent Posts

    • This blog has moved.
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: The Hollyhock Weevil
    • The Friday Beetle will be late…
    • Bed bugs reach an all-time high
    • Answer to the Monday Night Mystery
  • Recent Comments

    • Donald Byron Johnson on Reader question: who discovered the sex of ant workers?
    • Anonymous on Update on the Rogue Taxonomist
    • Ant on Arizona Daily Star covers “Planet of the Ants”
    • Ga. Girl on Beware the Cow-Killer
    • Anonymous on Beware the Cow-Killer
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • animation Ants aphids arachnids Argentina arizona army ants art Bees beetles behavior biodiversity biology Biology Links bugs Canon carabidae coleoptera copyright Darwin desert diptera E. O. Wilson ecology entomology Evolution fail fire ants Flies formicidae genetics google haiku Harpegnathos imaging Insect Links Insects invasive species lighting Linepithema macro macrophotography macro photography Martialis media miniscule muppets music myrmecology mystery natural history Nature new species odontomachus Parasites Paratrechina pests pheidole Photography Photography business photoshop phylogenetics phylogeny Pogonomyrmex politics predation Scarabaeidae Science SEM social insects spiders Taxonomy termites travel wasps
  • Nature Blog Network
    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Follow this blog

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Join 90 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: