• Home
  • About Alex Wild
  • Articles
  • Galleries
  • Myrmecology News

Myrmecos Blog

the little things matter

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Nature Blog Network
Happenings in the blogosphere »

The importance of aperture

February 2, 2009 by myrmecos

Among the least understood technical aspects of photography, at least for novices, is aperture.  Yet aperture has profound effects on the resulting image.  Consider the following series of photos, each taken with a macro setup of an MP-E lens on a Canon dSLR camera, focused at the foremost tip of an ant head head shot at increasingly smaller apertures:

apertureWhat’s going on?

Most lenses contain a diaphragm that can constrict from full open down to a little hole, controlling the amount of light that travels through the lens on its way to the film or sensor.  The size of the hole is called the aperture. It is measured as a fraction, such that an increase in the denominator signals a decrease in aperture.  F/8 is four times smaller than f/2.

As the aperture is decreased (or “stopped down”) the amount of light decreases, allowing a photographer to make use of slower shutter speeds.  Relevant to insect photography, smaller apertures also extend focal depth.  More of the subject appears in focus, a key property considering the razor-thin focal planes that plague the tiny realm of macro.  Here’s an example using a lady beetle:

aperture2

Most insect photographers shoot at small apertures (around f/9 to f/16 or so), maximizing focus over the broadest depth possible.  This is mostly where I work too, as a deep focal plane is ideal for illustrating behavior, morphology, and other aspects of biology.

Yet for aesthetics we should also consider the blurry, dreamy realm at the full-open end of the spectrum.  One of my favorite photographers, Rick Lieder, works exclusively wide open using ambient light, and his results are stunning.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Tricks of the Trade | Tagged aperture, Photography | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on February 2, 2009 at 9:08 pm Jack Jumper

    It called depth of field. It one of the basic principal of photography larger the F stop (f 2.8) the smaller the depth of field, small the F stop (f16) the greater the depth of field


  2. on February 2, 2009 at 10:12 pm Damien Franco

    Depth of field is also affected by the actual distance of the subject to the lens.


  3. on February 3, 2009 at 5:53 am Mike

    Thanks for breaking this down. Now I understand why my macro shots have such sketchy focus.


  4. on February 3, 2009 at 9:29 am Tim Eisele

    This brings up something I’ve been wondering about: presumably, insects have to deal with this problem all the time, because everything that they see is something that we would consider to be a macro shot. I gather that the way that they get around this is by using compound eyes, that can be considered to be hundreds of small, low-resolution, very-large-F-stop imagers (maybe even practically pinhole cameras in some cases?) They then composite the individual images to make a higher-resolution panorama.

    The question is, would there be benefits to making a custom-built macro camera the same way? Could we modify a camera CCD chip so that there were invididual images on clusters of, say, 20 pixels each, and then composite together the images to make an overall image with essentially infinite depth of field? Or do insects really see in such a fundamentally different manner than us, that we would never be able to convert what they see into a reasonable analogue of what we see?

    If this worked, it would certainly speed up macrophotography, because all you would have to do is get the light intensity right. Focusing would become a non-issue.


    • on January 30, 2010 at 11:46 pm Justin

      Tim Eisele: What counts as true macro photography is the relation between subject and sensor size, not just the size of the subject. What is a macro shot to our cameras is normal to their small eyes (ignoring that they have compound eyes, etc.). You can reduce the DoF problem simply by decreasing the size of the sensor. What is more limiting at their size is such things as diffraction.


  5. on February 3, 2009 at 9:31 am Rick Lieder

    Thanks for mentioning my work, Alex. I find I’m often struggling to get as much depth-of-field as possible, but have to settle for shooting wide open because of limited existing light. I often can’t use a tripod, which complicates things further.

    I’ve found that by limiting my lighting options to available light, it forces me to be more experimental and take more chances. I reject most of my images for focus problems, subject movement or camera shake. Failures far outweigh successes.

    Excellent images can be taken at large or small apertures, and with or without flash. For me it’s a matter of style, which of course some may not like. My technique won’t work when it’s important to see as much detail in the insect as possible, for the reasons you mentioned. I’m a painter too, and I’m trying for a painterly look in many of my images.

    Nice to see a discussion on the technical and aesthetic choices we make in macro photography.


  6. on September 28, 2009 at 6:58 am The importance of aperture, redux « Myrmecos Blog

    […] I wouldn’t say that either image is better.  The first is dreamier, more abstract, more interpretive.  The second is crisp and illustrative.  Quite a difference for a small tweaking of camera settings! […]



Comments are closed.


  • This blog is an archive; the Myrmecos blog has moved.

    Please update your bookmarks!
  • Alex’s Galleries

    alexanderwild.com

  • Recent Photos

    DarkQue bonito trabajo el de la Luna...iluminar vidas cuando andan a oscuras.Elephant HeadEastern Coyote, Southern OntarioWindowsジュエリーアイス
    More Photos
  • Biology Links

    • Tree of Life
    • Understanding Evolution
  • Blogroll

    • Ainsley Vs Livejournal
    • Ammonite
    • Anna’s Bee World
    • Archetype
    • Arthropoda blog
    • Backyard Arthropod Project
    • Beetles in the Bush
    • biodiversity in focus
    • Bug Dreams
    • Bug Eric
    • Bug Girl’s Blog
    • Burrard-Lucas Photoblog
    • Catalogue of Organisms
    • Creature Cast
    • Dan Heller
    • Debbie's Insect Blog
    • Dechronization
    • Drawing the MotMot
    • Entomoblog
    • Evolving Thoughts
    • Fall to Climb
    • Generant
    • Historias de Hormigas
    • Life on Six Legs
    • Macromite
    • microecos
    • mirmekolozi
    • myrmecoid
    • Myrmician
    • Natural Imagery
    • Nature in the Ozarks
    • NCSU Insect Blog
    • No Cropping Zone
    • omit needless words
    • Photo Synthesis
    • Princess Peppercloud
    • Science Blogs
    • Snail’s Tales
    • Stu Jenks
    • The Ant Hunter
    • The Ant Room
    • The Bug Whisperer
    • The Loom
    • This Week in Evolution
    • What's Bugging You?
    • Wild about Ants
    • Xenogere
  • Insect Links

    • Ant Farm Forum
    • Ant Insights
    • Antweb
    • Bug Squad
    • bugguide.net
    • Xerces Society
  • Photography Links

    • Canon Photography Forums
    • Digital Photography Review
    • DIY Photography
    • Igor Siwanowicz
    • Mark Plonsky
    • photo.net
    • Piotr Naskrecki
    • The Strobist
  • Popular Posts

    • How to Identify Queen Ants
    • Must we call them meat ants?
    • What does it mean to be an eyeless ant?
    • Ant Metamorphosis
    • Ants as seed dispersers - part 2
    • Mystery Myrmecophile
    • The Odorous House Ant, Tapinoma sessile
    • Specimen Request: Army/leafcutter/bullet ant queens for morphometrics
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Dendroides Larva
    • How to Identify the Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile
  • Recent Posts

    • This blog has moved.
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: The Hollyhock Weevil
    • The Friday Beetle will be late…
    • Bed bugs reach an all-time high
    • Answer to the Monday Night Mystery
  • Recent Comments

    • Donald Byron Johnson on Reader question: who discovered the sex of ant workers?
    • Anonymous on Update on the Rogue Taxonomist
    • Ant on Arizona Daily Star covers “Planet of the Ants”
    • Ga. Girl on Beware the Cow-Killer
    • Anonymous on Beware the Cow-Killer
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • animation Ants aphids arachnids Argentina arizona army ants art Bees beetles behavior biodiversity biology Biology Links bugs Canon carabidae coleoptera copyright Darwin desert diptera E. O. Wilson ecology entomology Evolution fail fire ants Flies formicidae genetics google haiku Harpegnathos imaging Insect Links Insects invasive species lighting Linepithema macro macrophotography macro photography Martialis media miniscule muppets music myrmecology mystery natural history Nature new species odontomachus Parasites Paratrechina pests pheidole Photography Photography business photoshop phylogenetics phylogeny Pogonomyrmex politics predation Scarabaeidae Science SEM social insects spiders Taxonomy termites travel wasps
  • Nature Blog Network
    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Follow this blog

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Join 91 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: