• Home
  • About Alex Wild
  • Articles
  • Galleries
  • Myrmecology News

Myrmecos Blog

the little things matter

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« New Species: Tetraponera merita
Sunday Night Movie: Shagged by a Rare Parrot »

Where to for National Geographic?

October 17, 2009 by myrmecos

NatGeo3

National Geographic remains the world’s premier showcase of nature photography. But I often wonder for how much longer.

It is easy to maintain a virtual monopoly on high quality imagery when camera equipment and publishing are expensive and require a highly specialized skill set.  But neither of these things is true anymore.  Professional-quality photo equipment is broadly affordable. And numerous online venues allow anyone with an internet connection to distribute their photos for free.

Consider the following fantastic arthropod photographers, all from the galleries of the free online site Flickr:

  • Opo Terser
  • Mundo Poco
  • Lord V

While these amateur photographers show stylistic differences among themselves and from established Nat Geo insect photographers Mark Moffett and Christian Ziegler, I’m not sure one could find consistent differences in overall artistry between the amateurs and the professionals.  And given the abundance with which amateurs share their work online, it is now possible to get a fix of rich nature photography for free.  At any hour.  Without waiting for the mailman to deliver it.

Incidentally, I do enjoy Nat Geo when it arrives on our doorstep every month.  I’m not knocking the organization or the quality of their publication.  I just wonder about the brand’s longevity as a seal of transcendent quality when the world is now drowning in spectacular photography.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Navel-Gazing, Photography Links | Tagged national geographic, nature photography, Photography | 8 Comments

8 Responses

  1. on October 17, 2009 at 12:40 pm James C. Trager

    Lord V’s Collembola images are amazing. I tried to photograph a Dicyrtomina once, with considerably inferior results to his!

    Just wondering, how does one shoot stacked images in the field? Or can that only be done indoors with a rapid-fire shutter/focus apparatus of some sort?


    • on October 17, 2009 at 2:26 pm myrmecos

      I’ve wondered that myself, James. I think the main thing is a motionless subject. A macro focusing rail is probably also helpful. But I’ve only tried it for dead specimens under a scope.

      I’ve got mixed feelings about focus-stacking in the field. You can really get some strikingly sharp images, but they often look a little bit…artificial.


  2. on October 17, 2009 at 12:58 pm Ant

    National Geographic is just going to have to try harder to compete. 😦


  3. on October 17, 2009 at 1:13 pm bradtroyphotography

    You make excellent points in this blog. It’s similar to how newspapers are struggling against online and television news. New technologies can make older ones obsolete.


  4. on October 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm Bob O'H

    One problem with just putting your photos up on Flickr is that they still have to be discovered. National Geographic still provides a consolidation service for good photos.

    I guess this raises the question of how you get these photos “out there”. Photosynthesis helps (I assume you got an increase in traffic after your month there), but only for the select few. Is there a website or blog that acts as a showcase for photographers like these and you) which allows more to be seen?


  5. on October 17, 2009 at 2:09 pm neil

    Nat Geo has actually been relatively proactive on this front with their MyShot feature, capitalizing on the cachet of their brand image to solicit content from amateur photographers at no cost to them. I can imagine that this may not make some of the professionals they employ that happy, but it seems at least some of the editorial staff is paying attention.

    If National Geographic was *just* a photography magazine they might be in trouble — but much of the photography in the magazine is linked to the scientific research that they fund. I hope that public interest in the science behind the amazing imagery remains vigorous enough to ensure the organization’s (and magazine’s) viability.


  6. on October 18, 2009 at 3:06 pm Jack Jumper

    What am I going to read while waiting for the doctor.


  7. on October 19, 2009 at 4:42 am generant

    Difficult times for magazines and newspapers. However, I believe they still have two advantages to offer:

    The first, as mentioned above by Neil, is the scientific content of their articles and pictures with an appropriate caption. As you have noticed many times in this blog, sometimes the “free” pictures are associated with a wrong caption.

    The second point is more about what to take a picture of and where? Price of cameras and technologies has decreased a lot, but travelling in some part of the world can still be very expensive, or risky without appropriate equipment or knowledge/ human network. The extreme ecosystems, such as the deep sea ecosystems, are also simply impossible for non scientists people to get access.

    For me, and I believe it is the case for other people, National Geographic is associated with the exploration of far wild lands (and seas), and I think there is still quite a few like that left. So I can imagine that it will have some more NG issues…



Comments are closed.


  • This blog is an archive; the Myrmecos blog has moved.

    Please update your bookmarks!
  • Alex’s Galleries

    alexanderwild.com

  • Recent Photos

    # SaloméArtificial Street Photography 1Kettering, Ohio, 2022IN WINTER'S GRIPVegetazione metallica.Un regard hypnotisant / A mesmerizing gaze
    More Photos
  • Biology Links

    • Tree of Life
    • Understanding Evolution
  • Blogroll

    • Ainsley Vs Livejournal
    • Ammonite
    • Anna’s Bee World
    • Archetype
    • Arthropoda blog
    • Backyard Arthropod Project
    • Beetles in the Bush
    • biodiversity in focus
    • Bug Dreams
    • Bug Eric
    • Bug Girl’s Blog
    • Burrard-Lucas Photoblog
    • Catalogue of Organisms
    • Creature Cast
    • Dan Heller
    • Debbie's Insect Blog
    • Dechronization
    • Drawing the MotMot
    • Entomoblog
    • Evolving Thoughts
    • Fall to Climb
    • Generant
    • Historias de Hormigas
    • Life on Six Legs
    • Macromite
    • microecos
    • mirmekolozi
    • myrmecoid
    • Myrmician
    • Natural Imagery
    • Nature in the Ozarks
    • NCSU Insect Blog
    • No Cropping Zone
    • omit needless words
    • Photo Synthesis
    • Princess Peppercloud
    • Science Blogs
    • Snail’s Tales
    • Stu Jenks
    • The Ant Hunter
    • The Ant Room
    • The Bug Whisperer
    • The Loom
    • This Week in Evolution
    • What's Bugging You?
    • Wild about Ants
    • Xenogere
  • Insect Links

    • Ant Farm Forum
    • Ant Insights
    • Antweb
    • Bug Squad
    • bugguide.net
    • Xerces Society
  • Photography Links

    • Canon Photography Forums
    • Digital Photography Review
    • DIY Photography
    • Igor Siwanowicz
    • Mark Plonsky
    • photo.net
    • Piotr Naskrecki
    • The Strobist
  • Popular Posts

    • Rover Ants (Brachymyrmex patagonicus), an emerging pest species
    • Specimen Request: Army/leafcutter/bullet ant queens for morphometrics
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Nicrophorus orbicollis
    • Myrmecology enters the age of genomics
    • New Species: Coprophanaeus caroliae
    • Eureka! Heureka! An Astonishing New Ant!
    • Ants of the Paraná, then and now
    • Reader question: who discovered the sex of ant workers?
    • Army Ants of the North
    • My, what big eyes you have...
  • Recent Posts

    • This blog has moved.
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: The Hollyhock Weevil
    • The Friday Beetle will be late…
    • Bed bugs reach an all-time high
    • Answer to the Monday Night Mystery
  • Recent Comments

    • Donald Byron Johnson on Reader question: who discovered the sex of ant workers?
    • Anonymous on Update on the Rogue Taxonomist
    • Ant on Arizona Daily Star covers “Planet of the Ants”
    • Ga. Girl on Beware the Cow-Killer
    • Anonymous on Beware the Cow-Killer
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • animation Ants aphids arachnids Argentina arizona army ants art Bees beetles behavior biodiversity biology Biology Links bugs Canon carabidae coleoptera copyright Darwin desert diptera E. O. Wilson ecology entomology Evolution fail fire ants Flies formicidae genetics google haiku Harpegnathos imaging Insect Links Insects invasive species lighting Linepithema macro macrophotography macro photography Martialis media miniscule muppets music myrmecology mystery natural history Nature new species odontomachus Parasites Paratrechina pests pheidole Photography Photography business photoshop phylogenetics phylogeny Pogonomyrmex politics predation Scarabaeidae Science SEM social insects spiders Taxonomy termites travel wasps
  • Nature Blog Network
    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Follow this blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Join 91 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: