• Home
  • About Alex Wild
  • Articles
  • Galleries
  • Myrmecology News

Myrmecos Blog

the little things matter

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Sunday Night Movie: She Blinded Me with Science
More Ice Abstracts »

Rare amber ants on ebay

January 4, 2010 by myrmecos

Paraneuretus (Formicidae:Aneuretinae), photo by ebay seller rmvveta

Here’s something unusual for the well-financed collector: Paraneuretus, an extinct genus from a nearly extinct subfamily of ants.  This pair of fossilized worker ants is selling on ebay today for over $400. Out of my budget for these sorts of things.

Most amber ants up for auction belong to common extinct species: Azteca, Tapinoma, Camponotus and so forth, usually from the Dominican or Baltic amber deposits and pertaining to extant genera. This is the first aneuretine I’ve seen.

What’s interesting about these ants? Well, they’re one of those neither-this-nor-that fossils that are intermediate between groups of modern ants. Aneuretines have a single petiolar node and a body structure much like the modern subfamilies Dolichoderinae and Formicinae. But unlike either of those, Paraneuretus retains a stinger. It’s like a proto-dolichoderine before the ancestral stinger was lost in favor of more derived chemical defenses.

A single aneuretine persists today: Aneuretus simoni, a small and probably endangered species from Sri Lanka.  Genetic analyses of that species show it to be sister to dolichoderines, as one would expect.  What is less clear is where fossils like Paraneuretus fit.  They might be relatives of Aneuretus, but their similarity might just be an artifact of retained ancestral traits, with Paraneuretus genealogically closer to the dolichoderines.  In any case, it is a fascinating fossil and a glimpse at an earlier ant body plan only rarely seen today.

By the way, if any of you end up buying these ants I urge you to consider donating the specimens to a museum where they will be available for scientific research.  Other specimens do exist, but these are in beautiful condition.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Ants, Insect Links, Science | Tagged Ants, ebay, Evolution, fossils | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on January 4, 2010 at 9:55 am dreptungeek

    Yes, $420 is a little more than what I have in my pockets right now… 😦


  2. on January 4, 2010 at 10:03 am Bob O'H

    Hmm, I wonder if we could band together to buy them for a museum. I’d be happy to throw in a few Euros.


  3. on January 4, 2010 at 10:11 am guy

    good idea


  4. on January 4, 2010 at 10:54 am Roberto Keller

    I’ll chip in the extra if the seller turns it into a pendant…


  5. on January 4, 2010 at 1:14 pm James C. Trager

    Not sure what museums are paying (or have paid) for such things, but $420 for these specimens seems like a good buy for a museum with a bit of discretionary cash on hand.


  6. on January 4, 2010 at 9:27 pm JasonC.

    It’s even cooler that the ants seem to have been fighting when they were fossilized. How long ago did the aneuretines and dolichoderines diverge?


    • on January 7, 2010 at 1:09 am Agnostic

      Aneuretus IS a dolichoderine and never diverged from dolichoderines. This results from published morphological (no salient apomorphies) and genetic analyses.


      • on January 7, 2010 at 4:24 pm Roberto Keller

        Taking the sister-group relationship between aneuretines and what is currently considered dolicoderines for granted (as shown in the best phylogenies we have so far), I think this is one of those cases in which where do we draw the “subfamily” line needs to be done on the basis of salient synapomorphies rather than just tree topology.

        On that account, current dolichoderines are well circumscribe by a major anatomical rearrangement of the gastral architecture. This involves the transverse folding of the pygidium on its midline more than 90o, with the result that the opening of the pygidial gland becomes the posterior-most part of the body. Even the direction of the pilosity is inverted on this plate (the fact that only four plates in the gaster are visible on dorsal view is an accident, i.e., it doesn’t have any function).

        Only Technomyrmex lacks this feature among dolichoderines. Not only does this has to be explained as a “reversal” given the position of this genus within dolichoderines, but on close inspection (that is, scanning electron microscopy as I have done), the pygidium has the appearance of an underdeveloped structure that doesn’t resemble unfolded pygidia in ants.

        There is another very striking morphological synapomorphy, present on all adult dolichoderines castes, that pertains the petiole and it’s unique among ants (and Hymenoptera for that matter), but it is unpublished and I won’t burn it here.

        Now, Aneuretus does have an unique petiole with a tubular peduncle that bends upwards immediately after its place of articulation with the propodeum. It also has a large groove on the anterior surface of the foretibia, again, unique in ants (oh well, I just burned that one). Unfortunately fossils like the ones pictures above have a more generalized petiole, and someone has to check for the groove on those.

        Both groups warrant subfamily status in my opinion.


      • on January 8, 2010 at 8:17 am myrmecos

        If we consider just the extant groups, I agree that we have plenty of grounds for retaining two subfamilies. But as usual the fossils are the problem, the primary challenge to a monophyletic Aneuretinae.

        The extant Aneuretus has plenty of distinguishing features, but even the petiolar shape of the fossils is ambiguous, especially if one considers that the long anterior peduncle might be pleisiomorphic, as Nothomyrmecia and Tetraponera seem to indicate. Not that I’ve looked at them in any detail, but my impression is that these fossils may just as likely be stem-group dolichoderines, or even stem group dolichoderomorphs.


    • on January 7, 2010 at 8:19 am myrmecos

      The ancestor of Aneuretus simoni and the extant dolichoderines is inferred to be about 90 million years old (Brady et al 2006). The modern dolichoderines are probably closer to the K/T boundary in age, and as these amber fossils are from about 40 million years ago they’re too young to be from a dolichoderine ancestor species themselves.

      agnostic’s point is a fair one: once we consider the fossils, it’s not clear that Aneuretinae needs to be separate from Dolichoderinae, as dolichoderines may be aneuretines that have lost the sting and made a few adjustments to the abdominal morphology.


  7. on January 5, 2010 at 12:36 am uphilldowndale

    They are beautiful.I hope they find there way to a ‘home’ when they can been seen by many.


  8. on January 20, 2010 at 10:53 pm Henry Barth

    THey didn’t sell at $419.99 so they’ve been relisted — now at $499.99



Comments are closed.


  • This blog is an archive; the Myrmecos blog has moved.

    Please update your bookmarks!
  • Alex’s Galleries

    alexanderwild.com

  • Recent Photos

    DarkQue bonito trabajo el de la Luna...iluminar vidas cuando andan a oscuras.Elephant HeadEastern Coyote, Southern OntarioWindowsジュエリーアイス
    More Photos
  • Biology Links

    • Tree of Life
    • Understanding Evolution
  • Blogroll

    • Ainsley Vs Livejournal
    • Ammonite
    • Anna’s Bee World
    • Archetype
    • Arthropoda blog
    • Backyard Arthropod Project
    • Beetles in the Bush
    • biodiversity in focus
    • Bug Dreams
    • Bug Eric
    • Bug Girl’s Blog
    • Burrard-Lucas Photoblog
    • Catalogue of Organisms
    • Creature Cast
    • Dan Heller
    • Debbie's Insect Blog
    • Dechronization
    • Drawing the MotMot
    • Entomoblog
    • Evolving Thoughts
    • Fall to Climb
    • Generant
    • Historias de Hormigas
    • Life on Six Legs
    • Macromite
    • microecos
    • mirmekolozi
    • myrmecoid
    • Myrmician
    • Natural Imagery
    • Nature in the Ozarks
    • NCSU Insect Blog
    • No Cropping Zone
    • omit needless words
    • Photo Synthesis
    • Princess Peppercloud
    • Science Blogs
    • Snail’s Tales
    • Stu Jenks
    • The Ant Hunter
    • The Ant Room
    • The Bug Whisperer
    • The Loom
    • This Week in Evolution
    • What's Bugging You?
    • Wild about Ants
    • Xenogere
  • Insect Links

    • Ant Farm Forum
    • Ant Insights
    • Antweb
    • Bug Squad
    • bugguide.net
    • Xerces Society
  • Photography Links

    • Canon Photography Forums
    • Digital Photography Review
    • DIY Photography
    • Igor Siwanowicz
    • Mark Plonsky
    • photo.net
    • Piotr Naskrecki
    • The Strobist
  • Popular Posts

    • How to Identify Queen Ants
    • Must we call them meat ants?
    • What does it mean to be an eyeless ant?
    • Ant Metamorphosis
    • Ants as seed dispersers - part 2
    • Mystery Myrmecophile
    • The Odorous House Ant, Tapinoma sessile
    • Specimen Request: Army/leafcutter/bullet ant queens for morphometrics
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: Dendroides Larva
    • How to Identify the Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile
  • Recent Posts

    • This blog has moved.
    • Friday Beetle Blogging: The Hollyhock Weevil
    • The Friday Beetle will be late…
    • Bed bugs reach an all-time high
    • Answer to the Monday Night Mystery
  • Recent Comments

    • Donald Byron Johnson on Reader question: who discovered the sex of ant workers?
    • Anonymous on Update on the Rogue Taxonomist
    • Ant on Arizona Daily Star covers “Planet of the Ants”
    • Ga. Girl on Beware the Cow-Killer
    • Anonymous on Beware the Cow-Killer
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • animation Ants aphids arachnids Argentina arizona army ants art Bees beetles behavior biodiversity biology Biology Links bugs Canon carabidae coleoptera copyright Darwin desert diptera E. O. Wilson ecology entomology Evolution fail fire ants Flies formicidae genetics google haiku Harpegnathos imaging Insect Links Insects invasive species lighting Linepithema macro macrophotography macro photography Martialis media miniscule muppets music myrmecology mystery natural history Nature new species odontomachus Parasites Paratrechina pests pheidole Photography Photography business photoshop phylogenetics phylogeny Pogonomyrmex politics predation Scarabaeidae Science SEM social insects spiders Taxonomy termites travel wasps
  • Nature Blog Network
    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Follow this blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Join 91 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Myrmecos Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: